People v. Zmitrovis

2019 NY Slip Op 3386
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 1, 2019
DocketInd. No. 1574/16
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 3386 (People v. Zmitrovis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Zmitrovis, 2019 NY Slip Op 3386 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Zmitrovis (2019 NY Slip Op 03386)
People v Zmitrovis
2019 NY Slip Op 03386
Decided on May 1, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 1, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
JEFFREY A. COHEN
BETSY BARROS
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2018-07993
(Ind. No. 1574/16)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Justin Zmitrovis, appellant.


Karen G. Leslie, Riverhead, NY, for appellant.

Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Thomas C. Costello of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Richard Ambro, J.), imposed May 24, 2018, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of the right to appeal was invalid and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 257). The County Court's limited colloquy did not ensure that the defendant understood the nature of the right to appeal (see id. at 257; People v DeJesus, 169 AD3d 712, 712; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 137-138).

However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, COHEN, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 3386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-zmitrovis-nyappdiv-2019.