People v. Zito

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Zito

181 A.D.2d 935, 580 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3083

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 5, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 181 A.D.2d 935 (People v. Zito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Zito, 181 A.D.2d 935, 580 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3083 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Leaman, J.), rendered December 5, 1988, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crimes of grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of a hypodermic instrument.

Having reviewed the record and brief submitted by defense counsel, we agree that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on this appeal. Consequently, the judgment should be affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Creeden, 150 AD2d 887).

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Leaman, J.), rendered December 5, 1988, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crimes of grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of a hypodermic instrument.

Having reviewed the record and brief submitted by defense counsel, we agree that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on this appeal. Consequently, the judgment should be affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Creeden, 150 AD2d 887).

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 A.D.2d 935, 580 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-zito-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack