People v. Zipfel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Zipfel

51 A.D.2d 979, 380 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11716

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 1, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 51 A.D.2d 979 (People v. Zipfel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Zipfel, 51 A.D.2d 979, 380 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered December 9, 1974, which granted defendant’s motion to set aside a jury verdict convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, and dismissed the indictment. Order reversed, on the law, the indictment and jury verdict are reinstated; and the case is remanded to Criminal Term for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. On a motion to set aside the verdict of a jury, the defendant bears the burden of establishing grounds on which the conviction, if appealed from, would have to be reversed as a matter of law (CPL 330.30, subd 1; 330.40, subd 2, par [g]). On this record it was entirely proper for the trial court to submit the charge of manslaughter in the second degree as a lesser included offense of murder (see CPL 300.40; People v Asan, 22 NY2d 526; People v Blowe, 40 AD2d 982). The other arguments raised by the defendant have been considered and found to be without merit. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Christ, Shapiro, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered December 9, 1974, which granted defendant’s motion to set aside a jury verdict convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, and dismissed the indictment. Order reversed, on the law, the indictment and jury verdict are reinstated; and the case is remanded to Criminal Term for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. On a motion to set aside the verdict of a jury, the defendant bears the burden of establishing grounds on which the conviction, if appealed from, would have to be reversed as a matter of law (CPL 330.30, subd 1; 330.40, subd 2, par [g]). On this record it was entirely proper for the trial court to submit the charge of manslaughter in the second degree as a lesser included offense of murder (see CPL 300.40; People v Asan, 22 NY2d 526; People v Blowe, 40 AD2d 982). The other arguments raised by the defendant have been considered and found to be without merit. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Christ, Shapiro, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 979, 380 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-zipfel-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack