People v. Zingale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Zingale

246 A.D.2d 613, 667 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 431

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 246 A.D.2d 613 (People v. Zingale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Zingale, 246 A.D.2d 613, 667 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 431 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.), rendered September 24, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly concluded that the frisk of the defendant which resulted in the seizure of a gun was supported by the requisite predicate of reasonable suspicion by the police that the defendant might be armed (see, e.g., People v Batista, 88 NY2d 650; People v Benjamin, 51 NY2d 267, 271). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Krausman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.), rendered September 24, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly concluded that the frisk of the defendant which resulted in the seizure of a gun was supported by the requisite predicate of reasonable suspicion by the police that the defendant might be armed (see, e.g., People v Batista, 88 NY2d 650; People v Benjamin, 51 NY2d 267, 271). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Krausman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D.2d 613, 667 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-zingale-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack