People v. Zienkowicz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Zienkowicz

196 A.D.2d 602, 601 N.Y.S.2d 860

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 16, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 196 A.D.2d 602 (People v. Zienkowicz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Zienkowicz, 196 A.D.2d 602, 601 N.Y.S.2d 860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from two amended judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Beerman, J.), both rendered April 7, 1992, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree under Indictment No. 1439/90, and attempted burglary in the second degree under Indictment No. 2694/90, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the amended judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from two amended judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Beerman, J.), both rendered April 7, 1992, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree under Indictment No. 1439/90, and attempted burglary in the second degree under Indictment No. 2694/90, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the amended judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 A.D.2d 602, 601 N.Y.S.2d 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-zienkowicz-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack