People v. Zhanay

103 A.D.3d 1092, 958 N.Y.S.2d 632

This text of 103 A.D.3d 1092 (People v. Zhanay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Zhanay, 103 A.D.3d 1092, 958 N.Y.S.2d 632 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John J. Brunetti, A.J.), rendered January 16, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the third degree (three counts) and criminal sexual act in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of, inter alia, three counts of rape in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.25 [2]), defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. That contention involves matters outside the record and should be raised by way of a motion pursuant to CPL article 440 (see People v Haffiz, 19 NY3d 883, 885 [2012]; People v Woods, 93 AD3d 1287, 1289 [2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 969 [2012]). Present—Smith, J.P., Fahey, Valentino, Whalen and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Haffiz
976 N.E.2d 216 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)
People v. Woods
93 A.D.3d 1287 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 A.D.3d 1092, 958 N.Y.S.2d 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-zhanay-nyappdiv-2013.