People v. Zerman
145 P. 151, 25 Cal. App. 729, 1914 Cal. App. LEXIS 191
Opinion
We are satisfied that the point made in this case in support of the appeal is not well taken, — namely, that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict and judgment. From a reading and consideration of the evidence we are satisfied that the contrary is the case. The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Zerman, 145 P. 151, 25 Cal. App. 729, 1914 Cal. App. LEXIS 191 (Cal. Ct. App. 1914).
145 P. 151 (People v. Zerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Peckham
249 Cal. App. 2d 941 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)
People v. Swanson
204 Cal. App. 2d 169 (California Court of Appeal, 1962)
Garden v. State
318 P.2d 652 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1957)
People v. Mendoza
229 P.2d 83 (California Court of Appeal, 1951)
People v. Cannon
176 P.2d 409 (California Court of Appeal, 1947)
People v. Holman
164 P.2d 297 (California Court of Appeal, 1945)
People v. McBride
159 P.2d 59 (California Court of Appeal, 1945)
People v. Jackson
147 P.2d 94 (California Court of Appeal, 1944)
People v. Meyers
144 P.2d 60 (California Court of Appeal, 1943)
People v. Holquin
120 P.2d 71 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)
People v. Johnson
115 P.2d 605 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)
People v. Moreno
79 P.2d 390 (California Court of Appeal, 1938)
People v. Chaddock
38 P.2d 473 (California Court of Appeal, 1934)
People v. Becker
35 P.2d 196 (California Court of Appeal, 1934)
Winning v. Board of Dental Examiners
300 P. 866 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)