People v. Zeagler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Zeagler

134 A.D.2d 916, 521 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51117

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 134 A.D.2d 916 (People v. Zeagler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Zeagler, 134 A.D.2d 916, 521 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting defendant of second degree burglary, her principal claim is that the prosecutor’s cross-examination of her expert witness deprived her of a fair trial. We disagree. Although at times the prosecutor’s conduct was less than exemplary, several of defense counsel’s objections were sustained and the court gave the jury curative instructions. Under these circumstances, defendant’s right to a fair trial was not compromised (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396). We have reviewed defendant’s remaining claims and find that none requires reversal. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Reed, J.— burglary, second degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting defendant of second degree burglary, her principal claim is that the prosecutor’s cross-examination of her expert witness deprived her of a fair trial. We disagree. Although at times the prosecutor’s conduct was less than exemplary, several of defense counsel’s objections were sustained and the court gave the jury curative instructions. Under these circumstances, defendant’s right to a fair trial was not compromised (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396). We have reviewed defendant’s remaining claims and find that none requires reversal. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Reed, J.— burglary, second degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 A.D.2d 916, 521 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-zeagler-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack