People v. Zaydman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Zaydman

142 A.D.2d 657, 530 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7406

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 11, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 142 A.D.2d 657 (People v. Zaydman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Zaydman, 142 A.D.2d 657, 530 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7406 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), rendered February 3, 1987, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we find that he was not deprived of the effective assistance of trial counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), rendered February 3, 1987, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we find that he was not deprived of the effective assistance of trial counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

142 A.D.2d 657, 530 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-zaydman-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack