People v. Zaydman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Zaydman

142 A.D.2d 657, 530 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7406

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 11, 1988·Published

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), rendered February 3, 1987, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we find that he was not deprived of the effective assistance of trial counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), rendered February 3, 1987, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we find that he was not deprived of the effective assistance of trial counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.

People v. Zaydman, 142 A.D.2d 657, 530 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7406 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

142 A.D.2d 657 (People v. Zaydman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related