People v. Zapata-Lopez

238 A.D.2d 618, 657 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4443

Opinion

—Appeal by the People from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Braun, J.), both dated March 14, 1996, which granted those branches of the defendants’ respective omnibus motions which were to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the evidence presented to the Grand Jury was legally insufficient.

Ordered that the orders are reversed, on the law, those branches of the defendants’ respective omnibus motions which were to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the evidence presented to the Grand Jury was legally insufficient are denied, the indictment is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings.

The Police Laboratory Analysis Report containing the results of the ballistics examination of the gun which the defendants allegedly possessed constituted legally sufficient evidence establishing the operability of that weapon (see, People v Rodriguez, 235 AD2d 504; CPL 190.30 [2]). Consequently, the Supreme Court erred in dismissing the indictment. Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Thompson and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Zapata-Lopez, 238 A.D.2d 618, 657 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4443 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

238 A.D.2d 618 (People v. Zapata-Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rodriguez
235 A.D.2d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)