People v. Zangrillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Zangrillo

24 A.D.2d 991, 265 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2882

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 6, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 991 (People v. Zangrillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Zangrillo, 24 A.D.2d 991, 265 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

In a coram nobis proceeding, defendant appeals from an “order” of the County Court, Nassau County, allegedly dated and entered May 6, 1965, which denied after a hearing his application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered December 6, 1963, convicting him of forgery in the second degree and sentencing him as a prior felony offender to a term of 5 to 10 years. Appeal dismissed. It appears that no written order has been made or entered denying defendant’s coram nobis application. Under the circumstances, defendant’s appeal from the nonexistent order of May 6, 1965 must be dismissed. However, we have considered defendant’s contentions and would affirm on the merits were the appeal not being dismissed. Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a coram nobis proceeding, defendant appeals from an “order” of the County Court, Nassau County, allegedly dated and entered May 6, 1965, which denied after a hearing his application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered December 6, 1963, convicting him of forgery in the second degree and sentencing him as a prior felony offender to a term of 5 to 10 years. Appeal dismissed. It appears that no written order has been made or entered denying defendant’s coram nobis application. Under the circumstances, defendant’s appeal from the nonexistent order of May 6, 1965 must be dismissed. However, we have considered defendant’s contentions and would affirm on the merits were the appeal not being dismissed. Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 991, 265 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-zangrillo-nyappdiv-1965.