People v. Zand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Zand

130 A.D.2d 610, 514 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46622

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 11, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 130 A.D.2d 610 (People v. Zand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Zand, 130 A.D.2d 610, 514 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46622 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Heller, J.), rendered January 12, 1987, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree and illegal possession of a vehicle identification number (two counts), after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, the evidence was sufficient as a matter of law to support the defendant’s conviction of the crimes charged. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the evidence was of sufficient quality and quantity to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Bauer, 113 AD2d 543, lv denied 67 NY2d 648, 880), including that he knowingly possessed the stolen property. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Heller, J.), rendered January 12, 1987, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree and illegal possession of a vehicle identification number (two counts), after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, the evidence was sufficient as a matter of law to support the defendant’s conviction of the crimes charged. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the evidence was of sufficient quality and quantity to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Bauer, 113 AD2d 543, lv denied 67 NY2d 648, 880), including that he knowingly possessed the stolen property. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 A.D.2d 610, 514 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-zand-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack