People v. Zalevsky

120 A.D.3d 522, 989 N.Y.S.2d 917
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 6, 2014
Docket2007-05887
StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D.3d 522 (People v. Zalevsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Zalevsky, 120 A.D.3d 522, 989 N.Y.S.2d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 22, 2011 (.People v Zalevsky, 82 AD3d 1136 [2011]), determining an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 18, 2007.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 *523 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]).

Eng, P.J., Dickerson, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Stultz
810 N.E.2d 883 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. Zalevsky
82 A.D.3d 1136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 A.D.3d 522, 989 N.Y.S.2d 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-zalevsky-nyappdiv-2014.