People v. Young

2024 NY Slip Op 01733
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 27, 2024
Docket2023-03738
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 01733 (People v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Young, 2024 NY Slip Op 01733 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

People v Young (2024 NY Slip Op 01733)
People v Young
2024 NY Slip Op 01733
Decided on March 27, 2024
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 27, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
ROBERT J. MILLER
LILLIAN WAN, JJ.

2023-03738
2023-03742

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Shantayne L. Young, appellant. (S.C.I. Nos. 197/21, 198/21)


Sharova Law Firm, Brooklyn, NY (Yelena Sharova of counsel), for appellant.

David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Goshen, NY (Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from (1) a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (William L. DeProspo, J.), imposed February 7, 2023, under Superior Court Information No. 197/21, and (2) a sentence of the same court imposed March 3, 2023, under Superior Court Information No. 198/21, upon her pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived her right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248). The defendant's valid waiver of her right to appeal precludes appellate review of her contention that the sentences imposed were excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255).

DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and WAN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 01733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-young-nyappdiv-2024.