People v. Young
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ingram, J.), imposed January 22, 2013, upon his conviction of robbery in the third degree, upon a jury verdict.
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
The resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Further, we reject the defendant’s contention that the resentence should be reduced in the interest of justice (cf. People v Cuaran, 261 AD2d 169, 169 [1999]).
Balkin, J.P., Dickerson, Leventhal, Miller and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
125 A.D.3d 795 (People v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.