People v. Young

261 A.D.2d 109, 690 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4599
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 4, 1999·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Covington, J., at suppression hearing; Joseph Cerbone, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered March 7, 1996, convicting defendant of murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 25 years to life and 12V2 to 25 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

[110]*110Defendant’s motion to suppress identification testimony was properly denied. Although the suppression court failed to make findings of fact or conclusions of law, in violation of CPL 710.60, there is an adequate record upon which this Court may make its own findings and conclusions (see, People v Jones, 247 AD2d 272, lv denied 92 NY2d 927). Although the photo array containing defendant’s photograph was lost, the copy of the array presented at the hearing, in addition to the testimony concerning the array, was sufficient to establish that it was not suggestive, and we find no evidence of suggestive police conduct. Defendant’s claim that his lineup was tainted by a witness’s premature viewing of the lineup fillers is contradicted by the record, which clearly establishes that no such event occurred with respect to this lineup.

The trial court properly denied defendant’s motion to reopen the Wade hearing on the basis of trial testimony claimed by defendant to indicate that there may have been a single-photo identification. The trial court correctly determined that the testimony in question was based on the witness’s misunderstanding of a question, and that the witness’s mistake was immediately rectified on further examination (see, CPL 710.40 [4]; People v Ferguson, 237 AD2d 187, lv denied 90 NY2d 857).

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining contentions. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Williams, Mazzarelli and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Young, 261 A.D.2d 109, 690 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4599 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

261 A.D.2d 109 (People v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PLUMLEY, MICHAEL, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
People v. Plumley
111 A.D.3d 1418 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Morciglio
29 A.D.3d 710 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Coleman
2 A.D.3d 1045 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. Jackson
284 A.D.2d 231 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)