People v. Young
This text of 224 A.D.2d 949 (People v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Under the circumstances of this case, County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying [950]*950defendant youthful offender treatment, and we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to grant such treatment (see, People v Parker, 222 AD2d 1122; People v Gaziano [appeal No. 1], 219 AD2d 870; cf., People v Shrubsall, 167 AD2d 929, 930). Furthermore, we conclude that the imposition of an indeterminate term of incarceration of 2 to 4 years upon defendant’s conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, a class C felony, is neither unduly harsh nor severe (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [b]). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Fricano, J.— Attempted Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Fallon, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 A.D.2d 949, 637 N.Y.S.2d 855, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-young-nyappdiv-1996.