People v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Young

186 A.D.2d 1072, 590 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11731

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 7, 1992·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant waived any defects that may have existed in the pre-sentence investigation report when he failed to raise an objection to its contents at the time of sentencing (see, People v Walworth, 167 AD2d 622, 623). Moreover, defendant has made no showing that County Court relied on any prejudicial information in imposing sentence (see, People v Redman, 148 AD2d 966, lv denied 74 NY2d 745). Defendant’s sentence, the result of a negotiated plea bargain, is not harsh or excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Steuben County Court, Scudder, J. — Burglary, 1st Degree.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant waived any defects that may have existed in the pre-sentence investigation report when he failed to raise an objection to its contents at the time of sentencing (see, People v Walworth, 167 AD2d 622, 623). Moreover, defendant has made no showing that County Court relied on any prejudicial information in imposing sentence (see, People v Redman, 148 AD2d 966, lv denied 74 NY2d 745). Defendant’s sentence, the result of a negotiated plea bargain, is not harsh or excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Steuben County Court, Scudder, J. — Burglary, 1st Degree.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Boehm, JJ.

People v. Young, 186 A.D.2d 1072, 590 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11731 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

186 A.D.2d 1072 (People v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related