People v. Young

259 A.D. 984, 20 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7541
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Young. Read the opinion of the Court — 264 A.D. 747

Opinion

Judgment of conviction reversed on the law and a new trial granted on the ground that there was prejudicial error on the part of the People in opening in making reference to a blood test and in making proof in respect thereto. There were also other prejudicial errors on the trial. All concur. (The judgment convicts defendant of the crime of violation of section 483 of the Penal Law.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Young, 259 A.D. 984, 20 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

259 A.D. 984 (People v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.