People v. Young
658 N.E.2d 209, 86 N.Y.2d 816, 634 N.Y.S.2d 432, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 5295
This text of 658 N.E.2d 209 (People v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Young, 658 N.E.2d 209, 86 N.Y.2d 816, 634 N.Y.S.2d 432, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 5295 (N.Y. 1995).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed. Defendant failed to preserve for this Court’s review his argument based upon People v Bleakley (69 NY2d 490). Defendant’s remaining arguments are without merit.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Ramos
222 A.D.2d 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
658 N.E.2d 209, 86 N.Y.2d 816, 634 N.Y.S.2d 432, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 5295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-young-ny-1995.