People v. Young
This text of 683 N.W.2d 669 (People v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE
v.
YOUNG.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
SC: 124811. COA: 240832.
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of June 3, 2004 is considered, and it is GRANTED. On reconsideration, we MODIFY our order of June 3, 2004. The appeal is limited to the following issues: (1) whether Michael Martin or Eugene Lawrence were accomplices; (2) whether the facts of the case establish a "closely drawn" issue of credibility; and (3) whether the "closely drawn" rule announced by this Court in People v. McCoy, 392 Mich. 231, 240, 220 N.W.2d 456 (1974), is inconsistent with MCL 768.29 and MCR 2.516(C).
Defendant-appellant's brief on appeal is due August 11, 2004.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
683 N.W.2d 669, 471 Mich. 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-young-mich-2004.