People v. Young

California Court of Appeal

People v. Young

38 Cal. App. 492

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 23, 1918

DocketCrim. No. 451

StatusPublished

This text of 38 Cal. App. 492 (People v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Young, 38 Cal. App. 492 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Defendant was convicted of “making and drawing a fictitious check” and was sentenced to the state prison at San Quentin “for a term of from one to-fourteen years. ’ ’ He appealed from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. The cause was placed upon the September calendar, and, counsel for the defendant not appearing, it was ordered, on September 10, 1918, that appellant have fifteen days in which to file his opening brief, the respondent ten days to answer, and appellant ten days to reply, cause then to stand submitted.

The time for filing appellant’s opening brief having expired and the time not having been extended, we must assume that the appeal has been abandoned, and, therefore, affirm the judgment for want of prosecution. We have, however, read the evidence in the case and find it sufficient to support the verdict.

The judgment is amended by striking out the words “for a term of from one to fourteen years,” and as thus amended the judgment and order are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Defendant was convicted of “making and drawing a fictitious check” and was sentenced to the state prison at San Quentin “for a term of from one to-fourteen years. ’ ’ He appealed from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. The cause was placed upon the September calendar, and, counsel for the defendant not appearing, it was ordered, on September 10, 1918, that appellant have fifteen days in which to file his opening brief, the respondent ten days to answer, and appellant ten days to reply, cause then to stand submitted.

The time for filing appellant’s opening brief having expired and the time not having been extended, we must assume that the appeal has been abandoned, and, therefore, affirm the judgment for want of prosecution. We have, however, read the evidence in the case and find it sufficient to support the verdict.

The judgment is amended by striking out the words “for a term of from one to fourteen years,” and as thus amended the judgment and order are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 Cal. App. 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-young-calctapp-1918.