People v. Yorke

2016 NY Slip Op 8548, 145 A.D.3d 920, 42 N.Y.S.3d 839
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 21, 2016·No. 2014-04224·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ambro, J.), rendered April 1, 2014, convicting him of criminal sale of a firearm in the third degree (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349 [2007]). Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity *921 to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The sentence imposed, including the imposition of consecutive sentences for counts one and three, was not harsh or excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Balkin, J.P., Austin, Sgroi and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Yorke, 2016 NY Slip Op 8548, 145 A.D.3d 920, 42 N.Y.S.3d 839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

2016 NY Slip Op 8548 (People v. Yorke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yorke v. LaManna
E.D. New York, 2021
People v. Yorke
2020 NY Slip Op 883 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Yorke
29 N.Y.3d 1038 (New York Court of Appeals, 2017)