People v. York

292 A.D.2d 551, 739 N.Y.S.2d 281, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2969
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. York. Read the opinion of the Court — 304 A.D.2d 681

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), rendered June 30, 1999, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 20-21; People v Santos, 86 NY2d 869, 870). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Ritter, J.P., O’Brien, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. York, 292 A.D.2d 551, 739 N.Y.S.2d 281, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

292 A.D.2d 551 (People v. York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gray
652 N.E.2d 919 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Santos
658 N.E.2d 1041 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)