People v. Yates

191 A.D.2d 195, 595 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2064
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Yates. Read the opinion of the Court — 207 A.D.2d 567

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J.), rendered May 15, 1991, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s argument that the trial court improperly limited his cross-examination of the undercover officer concerning police "sweeps” is unpreserved for appellate review, there being nothing in the record to explain the relevance and materiality of this proposed line of inquiry (People v Trinidad, 177 AD2d 286, lv denied 79 NY2d 865). If we were to review in the interest of justice, we would find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion (supra) and that it afforded defense counsel sufficient scope within which to prove its defense. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Carro, Rosenberger and Ross, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Yates, 191 A.D.2d 195, 595 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2064 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

191 A.D.2d 195 (People v. Yates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Trinidad
177 A.D.2d 286 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)