People v. Yates

816 N.E.2d 184, 3 N.Y.3d 625, 782 N.Y.S.2d 395, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 1577
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 24, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The *626 arresting officer testified that he believed that defendant, the sole passenger in a lawfully stopped taxi, was attempting to exit the vehicle too quickly to have paid his fare, in violation of Penal Law § 165.15. Under these circumstances he properly detained defendant temporarily for the limited purpose of ascertaining from the driver whether defendant had in fact paid his fare. We need not now resolve the broader issue whether a police officer may, as a matter of course, compel a passenger to remain inside a lawfully stopped vehicle (see People v McLaurin, 70 NY2d 779, 781 [1987]).

Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur; Chief Judge Kaye taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Yates, 816 N.E.2d 184, 3 N.Y.3d 625, 782 N.Y.S.2d 395, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 1577 (N.Y. 2004).

816 N.E.2d 184 (People v. Yates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Douglas
42 A.D.3d 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)