People v. Yanes

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Yanes

314 N.E.2d 878, 34 N.Y.2d 767, 358 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1534

DecidedJune 6, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 314 N.E.2d 878 (People v. Yanes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Yanes, 314 N.E.2d 878, 34 N.Y.2d 767, 358 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1534 (N.Y. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders affirmed in the following memorandum: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a further adjournment for a further change of counsel. There were significant reasons why the case should be- processed with expedition. There had been changes of counsel before and there had been a number of adjournments. As a consequence, no issue of law is raised in the case as there would be if there had been an abuse of discretion. Other issues raised do not require discussion.

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Rabin and Stevens.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders affirmed in the following memorandum: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a further adjournment for a further change of counsel. There were significant reasons why the case should be- processed with expedition. There had been changes of counsel before and there had been a number of adjournments. As a consequence, no issue of law is raised in the case as there would be if there had been an abuse of discretion. Other issues raised do not require discussion.

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Rabin and Stevens.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

314 N.E.2d 878, 34 N.Y.2d 767, 358 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-yanes-ny-1974.