People v. Yamerdo

New York Supreme Court

People v. Yamerdo

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 43

DecidedOctober 11, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 43 (People v. Yamerdo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Yamerdo, 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 43 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Bischoff, J.:

The fact that the defendant is the holder of a liquor tax certificate and would suffer substantial pecuniary loss through a conviction of the misdemeanor charged affords sufficient ground for a direction that the charge should be prosecuted by indictment. I have so held upon applications of this character in the past, and find no reason for altering my views.

See People v. Stewart, N. Y. L. Journal, July 30, 1900.

Motions granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bischoff, J.:

The fact that the defendant is the holder of a liquor tax certificate and would suffer substantial pecuniary loss through a conviction of the misdemeanor charged affords sufficient ground for a direction that the charge should be prosecuted by indictment. I have so held upon applications of this character in the past, and find no reason for altering my views.

See People v. Stewart, N. Y. L. Journal, July 30, 1900.

Motions granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-yamerdo-nysupct-1902.