People v. Yakuba

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Yakuba

11 A.D.3d 256, 782 N.Y.S.2d 909, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11817

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 12, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.3d 256 (People v. Yakuba) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Yakuba, 11 A.D.3d 256, 782 N.Y.S.2d 909, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd G. Goodman, J.), rendered February 7, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of three counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility and identification (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). The credible evidence established that the People’s witnesses had an ample opportunity to observe defendant and make reliable identifications. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Andrias, Saxe and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd G. Goodman, J.), rendered February 7, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of three counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility and identification (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). The credible evidence established that the People’s witnesses had an ample opportunity to observe defendant and make reliable identifications. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Andrias, Saxe and Lerner, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.3d 256, 782 N.Y.S.2d 909, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-yakuba-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack