People v. Yagmin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Yagmin

283 A.D. 1098, 131 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6423

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 21, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D. 1098 (People v. Yagmin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Yagmin, 283 A.D. 1098, 131 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6423 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant appeals from a judgment of a City Magistrate, sitting as a Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, convicting her of a violation of subdivision 5-a of section 70 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (leaving scene of accident without reporting), and from the sentence to pay a fine of $25 or to serve ten days in the city prison. The fine was paid. [1099]*1099Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, information dismissed and the fine remitted. The evidence fails to prove all the elements of the misdemeanor beyond a reasonable doubt. No separate appeal lies from the sentence, which has been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MaeCrate and Beldoek, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant appeals from a judgment of a City Magistrate, sitting as a Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, convicting her of a violation of subdivision 5-a of section 70 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (leaving scene of accident without reporting), and from the sentence to pay a fine of $25 or to serve ten days in the city prison. The fine was paid. [1099]*1099Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, information dismissed and the fine remitted. The evidence fails to prove all the elements of the misdemeanor beyond a reasonable doubt. No separate appeal lies from the sentence, which has been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MaeCrate and Beldoek, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D. 1098, 131 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-yagmin-nyappdiv-1954.