People v. Wyzykowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Wyzykowski

120 A.D.3d 1603, 992 N.Y.S.2d 665

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 26, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D.3d 1603 (People v. Wyzykowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Wyzykowski, 120 A.D.3d 1603, 992 N.Y.S.2d 665 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski, A.J.), rendered July 25, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sexual act in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal sexual act in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.50 [4]). To the extent that defendant’s contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at sentencing survives his guilty plea, we conclude that it lacks merit (see People v LaCroce, 83 AD3d 1388, 1388 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 807 [2011]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that Supreme Court erred in failing to recuse itself (see People v Prado, 4 NY3d 725, 726 [2004], rearg denied 4 NY3d 795 [2005]; People v Dewiel, 100 AD3d 1524, 1525 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 1010 [2013]). In any event, that contention is without merit (see generally People v Glynn, 21 NY3d 614, 618 [2013]; People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405-406 [1987]; People v Williams, 57 AD3d 1440, 1441 [2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 789 [2009]).

Present — Scudder, PJ., Peradotto, Carni and Valentino, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski, A.J.), rendered July 25, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sexual act in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal sexual act in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.50 [4]). To the extent that defendant’s contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at sentencing survives his guilty plea, we conclude that it lacks merit (see People v LaCroce, 83 AD3d 1388, 1388 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 807 [2011]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that Supreme Court erred in failing to recuse itself (see People v Prado, 4 NY3d 725, 726 [2004], rearg denied 4 NY3d 795 [2005]; People v Dewiel, 100 AD3d 1524, 1525 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 1010 [2013]). In any event, that contention is without merit (see generally People v Glynn, 21 NY3d 614, 618 [2013]; People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405-406 [1987]; People v Williams, 57 AD3d 1440, 1441 [2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 789 [2009]).

Present — Scudder, PJ., Peradotto, Carni and Valentino, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D.3d 1603, 992 N.Y.S.2d 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wyzykowski-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack