People v. Wuest

174 N.E.2d 330, 9 N.Y.2d 731
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 2, 1961·Published

Opinion

Order of the County Court reversed and the case remitted to that court upon the ground that at the time in question the defendant was in a public place. Since the order of reversal does not comply with section 543-a of the Code of Criminal Procedure in that it does not state whether its determination is upon the law or the facts or both, we must presume (§ 543-a, subd. 4) that it was upon the law alone- and, therefore, remit this appeal to the County Court for a determination of the questions of fact. (People v. Kruger, 302 N. Y. 447.) No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Fboessel, Van Voobhis, Bubke and Fosteb.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wuest, 174 N.E.2d 330, 9 N.Y.2d 731 (N.Y. 1961).

174 N.E.2d 330 (People v. Wuest) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kruger
99 N.E.2d 233 (New York Court of Appeals, 1951)