People v. Wuckich

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Wuckich

194 N.E.2d 135, 13 N.Y.2d 953

DecidedOctober 31, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 194 N.E.2d 135 (People v. Wuckich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Wuckich, 194 N.E.2d 135, 13 N.Y.2d 953 (N.Y. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis and Scileppi. Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Burke and Foster dissent and vote to withhold determination of appeal and to remit the case to the Onondaga County Court for a hearing to determine (1) the question of fact as to when the District Attorney first learned that defendant had returned to New York from Florida, and (2) whether there was sufficient cause for the delay in bringing defendant to trial in Onondaga County Court after the District Attorney learned of defendant’s return to New York.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis and Scileppi. Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Burke and Foster dissent and vote to withhold determination of appeal and to remit the case to the Onondaga County Court for a hearing to determine (1) the question of fact as to when the District Attorney first learned that defendant had returned to New York from Florida, and (2) whether there was sufficient cause for the delay in bringing defendant to trial in Onondaga County Court after the District Attorney learned of defendant’s return to New York.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 N.E.2d 135, 13 N.Y.2d 953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wuckich-ny-1963.