People v. Wroblewski

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Wroblewski

493 N.E.2d 943, 67 N.Y.2d 933, 502 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 18080

New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 29, 1986·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. The finding of probable cause made by the Appellate Division involves a mixed question of law and fact which, there being support for its conclusion in the record, is beyond our power of review (see, People v Bigelow, 66 NY2d 417, 420-421). On the remaining issues, we affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice (as he then was) Stewart F. Hancock, Jr., at the Appellate Division (109 AD2d 39).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone. Taking no part: Judge Hancock, Jr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. The finding of probable cause made by the Appellate Division involves a mixed question of law and fact which, there being support for its conclusion in the record, is beyond our power of review (see, People v Bigelow, 66 NY2d 417, 420-421). On the remaining issues, we affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice (as he then was) Stewart F. Hancock, Jr., at the Appellate Division (109 AD2d 39).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone. Taking no part: Judge Hancock, Jr.

People v. Wroblewski, 493 N.E.2d 943, 67 N.Y.2d 933, 502 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 18080 (N.Y. 1986).

Pincite

493 N.E.2d 943 (People v. Wroblewski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related