People v. Wright

280 A.D.2d 955, 720 N.Y.S.2d 870, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3465
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Wright. Read the opinion of the Court — 256 A.D.2d 643

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [3]), robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [2] [a]) and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 265.01 [2]), defendant contends that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. We disagree (see generally, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Although no one saw defendant take the items from the Rite-Aid store, the circumstantial evidence of defendant’s guilt is overwhelming. We further conclude that the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Brunetti, J. — Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wright, 280 A.D.2d 955, 720 N.Y.S.2d 870, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3465 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

280 A.D.2d 955 (People v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)