People v. Wright

262 A.D.2d 339, 689 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5862
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Wright. Read the opinion of the Court — 228 A.D.2d 709

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Honorof, J.), rendered January 9, 1998, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree (four counts) and robbery in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual [340]*340review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Friedmann, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wright, 262 A.D.2d 339, 689 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

262 A.D.2d 339 (People v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)