People v. Wright

228 A.D.2d 709, 646 N.Y.2d 131, 646 N.Y.S.2d 131, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7373
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 24, 1996·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

"[T]he law is clear that the indelible and nonwaivable right to counsel arises only after an accusatory instrument has been filed, as this is the means by which a criminal action is formally commenced” (People v Horn, 161 AD2d 603, 604; see, CPL 1.20 [1], [8], [17]; People v Samuels, 49 NY2d 218). Moreover, it is the filing and not the filling out of the felony complaint which commences the prosecution for purposes of the attachment of [710]*710the defendant’s right to counsel (see, People v Lane, 64 NY2d 1047). Here, the defendant was not denied his right to counsel and the statements he made to police officers upon his arrest were properly admitted into evidence where the felony complaint was not filed until after the defendant was arrested. Moreover, the defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). Pizzuto, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wright, 228 A.D.2d 709, 646 N.Y.2d 131, 646 N.Y.S.2d 131, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7373 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

228 A.D.2d 709 (People v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. C.R. & D.W.
35 Misc. 3d 762 (New York Supreme Court, 2012)
People v. Caruso
34 A.D.3d 860 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Wright
242 A.D.2d 550 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Strother
234 A.D.2d 571 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)