People v. Wosu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Wosu

256 A.D.2d 1247, 683 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14476

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 1998·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Motion for review and determination, and for other relief denied. Memorandum: “[I]n the [1248]*1248absence of an authorizing statute no direct appeal lies” from an order denying a motion to inspect Grand Jury minutes (Matter of Miranda v Isseks, 41 AD2d 176, 177; see, Matter of Hudson v Albany County Grand Jury, 165 AD2d 966, 967). In addition, no direct appeal lies from an order denying a motion for disclosure of a presentence report (see, People v Wright, 206 AD2d 337, lv denied 84 NY2d 873). Present — Denman, P. J., Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Motion for review and determination, and for other relief denied. Memorandum: “[I]n the [1248]*1248absence of an authorizing statute no direct appeal lies” from an order denying a motion to inspect Grand Jury minutes (Matter of Miranda v Isseks, 41 AD2d 176, 177; see, Matter of Hudson v Albany County Grand Jury, 165 AD2d 966, 967). In addition, no direct appeal lies from an order denying a motion for disclosure of a presentence report (see, People v Wright, 206 AD2d 337, lv denied 84 NY2d 873). Present — Denman, P. J., Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

People v. Wosu, 256 A.D.2d 1247, 683 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14476 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

256 A.D.2d 1247 (People v. Wosu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related