People v. Woska

292 A.D.2d 403, 738 N.Y.S.2d 596, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2169

This text of 292 A.D.2d 403 (People v. Woska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Woska, 292 A.D.2d 403, 738 N.Y.S.2d 596, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2169 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), rendered June 1, 2000, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), or without merit. S. Miller, J.P., Schmidt, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
292 A.D.2d 403, 738 N.Y.S.2d 596, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-woska-nyappdiv-2002.