People v. Worth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Worth

33 A.D.3d 427, 821 N.Y.S.2d 765

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 12, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.3d 427 (People v. Worth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Worth, 33 A.D.3d 427, 821 N.Y.S.2d 765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), rendered January 7, 2005, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses review of his challenges to the court’s suppression ruling, and to the procedures by which the court arrived at its determination (People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]; see also People v Allen, 86 NY2d 599, 602-603 [1995]). We have considered and rejected defendant’s arguments concerning the enforceability of the waiver. Concur—Tom, J.E, Marlow, Sullivan, McGuire and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), rendered January 7, 2005, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses review of his challenges to the court’s suppression ruling, and to the procedures by which the court arrived at its determination (People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]; see also People v Allen, 86 NY2d 599, 602-603 [1995]). We have considered and rejected defendant’s arguments concerning the enforceability of the waiver. Concur—Tom, J.E, Marlow, Sullivan, McGuire and Malone, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.3d 427, 821 N.Y.S.2d 765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-worth-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack