People v. World

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. World

114 A.D.2d 480, 494 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53180

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 21, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 114 A.D.2d 480 (People v. World) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. World, 114 A.D.2d 480, 494 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53180 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Browne, J.), [481]*481rendered December 18, 1979, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. This appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence and incriminating statements (Naro, J.).

Judgment affirmed.

We reject appellant’s contention concerning the reliability of the information received by the arresting officer. That information, including a description, came from a second officer from whose presence it is rather clear the defendant had fled just a few seconds before the arresting officer arrived at the scene. Under the circumstances, there was probable cause for the arrest and the testimony of the second officer was not necessary to establish probable cause at the suppression hearing. Lazer, J. P., O’Connor, Niehoff and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Browne, J.), [481]*481rendered December 18, 1979, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. This appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence and incriminating statements (Naro, J.).

Judgment affirmed.

We reject appellant’s contention concerning the reliability of the information received by the arresting officer. That information, including a description, came from a second officer from whose presence it is rather clear the defendant had fled just a few seconds before the arresting officer arrived at the scene. Under the circumstances, there was probable cause for the arrest and the testimony of the second officer was not necessary to establish probable cause at the suppression hearing. Lazer, J. P., O’Connor, Niehoff and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 A.D.2d 480, 494 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-world-nyappdiv-1985.