People v. Workman

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Workman

192 N.W.2d 17, 34 Mich. App. 705

Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided June 29, 1971·No. Docket No. 10572·Published

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was charged with the statutory rape (MCLA § 750.520 [Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.788]) of a 12-year-old girl and was convicted by a jury of the lesser included offense of assault with intent to commit the crime of rape (MCLA § 750.85 [Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.280]).

Defendant alleges that the verdict was contrary to law and that there 'vas insufficient evidence to warrant a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt and that prejudicial error occurred on defendant’s cross-examination by the prosecuting attorney.

An examination of the record discloses no jurisdictional or fundamental error which would require a reversal of the conviction.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was charged with the statutory rape (MCLA § 750.520 [Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.788]) of a 12-year-old girl and was convicted by a jury of the lesser included offense of assault with intent to commit the crime of rape (MCLA § 750.85 [Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.280]).

Defendant alleges that the verdict was contrary to law and that there 'vas insufficient evidence to warrant a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt and that prejudicial error occurred on defendant’s cross-examination by the prosecuting attorney.

An examination of the record discloses no jurisdictional or fundamental error which would require a reversal of the conviction.

Affirmed.

People v. Workman, 192 N.W.2d 17, 34 Mich. App. 705 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

192 N.W.2d 17 (People v. Workman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related