People v. Workman
This text of 192 N.W.2d 17 (People v. Workman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was charged with the statutory rape (MCLA § 750.520 [Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.788]) of a 12-year-old girl and was convicted by a jury of the lesser included offense of assault with intent to commit the crime of rape (MCLA § 750.85 [Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.280]).
Defendant alleges that the verdict was contrary to law and that there 'vas insufficient evidence to warrant a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt and that prejudicial error occurred on defendant’s cross-examination by the prosecuting attorney.
An examination of the record discloses no jurisdictional or fundamental error which would require a reversal of the conviction.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
192 N.W.2d 17, 34 Mich. App. 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-workman-michctapp-1971.