Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Woolfolk

People v. Woolfolk

337 N.E.2d 600, 37 N.Y.2d 766, 375 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2135
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 8, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 337 N.E.2d 600 (People v. Woolfolk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Woolfolk, 337 N.E.2d 600, 37 N.Y.2d 766, 375 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2135 (N.Y. 1975).

Opinion

Memorandum. Defense counsel had ample opportunity to examine the exhibits prior to their being received in evidence. Under these circumstances, the court properly exercised its discretion in allowing the jurors to inspect the exhibits (CPL 310.20) and the inadvertent introduction of the additional [768]*768matter and review of the same by the jury cannot be said, as a matter of law, to constitute reversible error.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

K. v. V.
2024 NY Slip Op 50460(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2024)
In Re Shanee Carol B.
550 S.E.2d 636 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 2001)
In Re Tamara R.
764 A.2d 844 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2000)
People v. Benjamin
272 A.D.2d 276 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
L. v. G.
497 A.2d 215 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
337 N.E.2d 600, 37 N.Y.2d 766, 375 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-woolfolk-ny-1975.