People v. Woolard

127 A.D.3d 793, 4 N.Y.S.3d 547
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 1, 2015
Docket2013-10241
StatusPublished

This text of 127 A.D.3d 793 (People v. Woolard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Woolard, 127 A.D.3d 793, 4 N.Y.S.3d 547 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

*794 Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), imposed October 22, 2013, upon his conviction of attempted assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]), and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Dillon, Leventhal, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A.D.3d 793, 4 N.Y.S.3d 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-woolard-nyappdiv-2015.