People v. Woods
This text of 762 N.W.2d 519 (People v. Woods) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Donyelle Ferdinand WOODS, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion to allow supplemental argument is GRANED. The application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to hold appeal in abeyance, motion for miscellaneous relief, and motion to remand are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
762 N.W.2d 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-woods-mich-2009.