People v. Woodring
214 A.D.2d 1018, 627 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6768
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 28, 1995
StatusPublished
This text of 214 A.D.2d 1018 (People v. Woodring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Woodring, 214 A.D.2d 1018, 627 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6768 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).
Opinion
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and indictment dismissed. Same Memorandum as in People v Schmadebeck (214 AD2d 1016 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Wesley, Doerr, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Schmadebeck
214 A.D.2d 1016 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
214 A.D.2d 1018, 627 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-woodring-nyappdiv-1995.