People v. Woodham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Woodham

135 A.D.2d 821, 523 N.Y.S.2d 33, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52750

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 28, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 135 A.D.2d 821 (People v. Woodham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Woodham, 135 A.D.2d 821, 523 N.Y.S.2d 33, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52750 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Heller, J.), rendered March 21, 1985, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, is legally sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621; People v Bailey, 134 AD2d 356). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the defendant’s guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Heller, J.), rendered March 21, 1985, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, is legally sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621; People v Bailey, 134 AD2d 356). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the defendant’s guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 A.D.2d 821, 523 N.Y.S.2d 33, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-woodham-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack