People v. Woodard

2 Misc. 2d 26, 150 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1956 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1949
CourtNew York County Courts
DecidedApril 11, 1956
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Misc. 2d 26 (People v. Woodard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York County Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Woodard, 2 Misc. 2d 26, 150 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1956 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1949 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1956).

Opinion

Nevins, J.

This is an appeal from a conviction of a violation of subdivision 2 of section 56 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law.

An appellate court must review the evidence to determine if there was proof beyond a reasonable doubt to sustain a conviction. (Code Crim Pro., § 764.)

A brief summary of the testimony was in the Police Justice return, but the testimony was not reduced to writing. It is impossible to judge the credibility and weight to be given conflicting testimony where it is briefly summarized in narrative form and not set out verbatim.

It follows that a reasonable doubt is created, and the defendant is entitled to his discharge.

Information dismissed; fine remitted.

Prepare order accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Misc. 2d 26, 150 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1956 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-woodard-nycountyct-1956.