People v. Wondolowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Wondolowski

116 A.D.2d 959, 498 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51730

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 30, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 116 A.D.2d 959 (People v. Wondolowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Wondolowski, 116 A.D.2d 959, 498 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51730 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Yesawich, Jr., J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Turner, Jr., J.), rendered May 28, 1985, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.

Defendant maintains that because he suffers from chronic alcoholism, the sentence of IVz to 4 years’ imprisonment is unduly harsh and excessive. It appears that the sentence imposed does not exceed that which was agreed upon by defendant as a condition of his plea. Since defendant has no appeal as of right nor sought leave to appeal as required by [960]*960CPL 450.10, the appeal is dismissed (see, People v Hickman, 111 AD2d 959). Were we to reach the merits of defendant’s argument, we would find it unavailing for the record discloses that although afforded rehabilitative opportunities in the past, defendant has either failed to take advantage of them or not profited from them.

Appeal dismissed. Kane, J. P., Main, Casey, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Yesawich, Jr., J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Turner, Jr., J.), rendered May 28, 1985, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.

Defendant maintains that because he suffers from chronic alcoholism, the sentence of IVz to 4 years’ imprisonment is unduly harsh and excessive. It appears that the sentence imposed does not exceed that which was agreed upon by defendant as a condition of his plea. Since defendant has no appeal as of right nor sought leave to appeal as required by [960]*960CPL 450.10, the appeal is dismissed (see, People v Hickman, 111 AD2d 959). Were we to reach the merits of defendant’s argument, we would find it unavailing for the record discloses that although afforded rehabilitative opportunities in the past, defendant has either failed to take advantage of them or not profited from them.

Appeal dismissed. Kane, J. P., Main, Casey, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 A.D.2d 959, 498 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wondolowski-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack