People v. Won
This text of 208 A.D.2d 393 (People v. Won) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Albert Williams, J., at pretrial proceeding; Robert Haft, J., at trial and sentence), rendered June 28, 1990, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of one count of conspiracy in the fourth degree and two counts of attempted grand larceny in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 2 to 4 years on each count, unanimously affirmed.
Given the number of times the complainant encountered defendant at the restaurant bar, as well as the length and [394]*394highly charged nature of those encounters, the complainant’s Grand Jury testimony clearly established that she was sufficiently familiar with defendant that, as a matter of law, there was no risk that police suggestion could lead to a misidentification (People v Rodriguez, 79 NY2d 445, 450). Accordingly, the court properly denied defendant a Wade hearing without first conducting a hearing as to whether the photographic identification was merely confirmatory in nature (supra). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Kupferman, Asch, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
208 A.D.2d 393, 617 N.Y.S.2d 161, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-won-nyappdiv-1994.